Audit & Risk

Companies “less compliant” with governance code

New research finds that just over half of companies are fully compliant with the UK corporate governance code.

in News.

Article Image

The percentage of FTSE 350 companies complying with the UK corporate governance code has declined in 2015, despite providing better explanations, new research has found.

According to Grant Thornton’s corporate governance review, called Trust and integrity – loud and clear?, 57 per cent of FTSE 350 companies were fully compliant with the codes in their latest financial statements, a decline from 61 per cent in 2014.

Of the remaining companies, 90 per cent complied with all but one or two of the code provisions, also down from 93.5 per cent in 2014.

The code requires half of the board to be independent non-executive directors, and 12.8 per cent of the FTSE 350 did not comply with this provision. Only 13 per cent of chairmen personally discussed culture in their primary statements and only 11 companies applied all the regulatory requirements in a “connected, transparent and informative way”.

The firm also found companies have continued to struggle with their forward-looking reporting, with only 41 per cent giving a good or detailed disclosure, while half of the companies commit to undertaking an audit tender at least once every ten years. Nearly all (91 per cent) of businesses have an internal audit function.

The review also found the average length of an annual report was 158 pages, compared to 155 in 2014, while the financial statement has reduced in average length to 61 pages from 68.

Read Grant Thornton's full report here

The IIA: find out more

Visit the main IIA site


Audit Senior

Grade: Senior
Business Unit: Audit and Advisory – Public Sector
Location: Leeds
Reporting to Audit Senior Managers
Key Relationships: Audit Managers and Senior Managers, Graduate Trainees, Key client contacts

IT Audit Assistant Manager

Grade: Assistant Manager
Business Unit: Consulting
Location: Birmingham
Reporting to IT Audit Directors and Partners

Internal Auditor (Qualified Senior to Assistant Manager)

Grade: Qualified Senior or Assistant Manager
Business Unit: Governance, Risk, & Internal Controls – Public Sector
Location: London, City (Tower Bridge House)
Reporting to Internal Audit Managers and Partner
Key Relationships: Internal Audit Team, new and existing clients

Careers advice

Chartered by Experience

There is a new route to becoming a chartered internal auditor: Chartered by Experience.

Room to grow

If you feel stuck in your role or sector, yet are keen to progress in an internal auditing career, what are your options? You could become a non-executive director or contribute your experience to higher education, suggests Ann Brook CFIIA.

Time to volunteer

Rachel Bowden, chair of the IIA’s Guidance Working Group, explains why she started volunteering and what she has gained from the experience.

Training & Development

CPD: work in progress

Staying up to date is essential if you want to have a successful career in internal audit – and the IIA’s CPD competency framework is designed to help.

Tap into a rich resource

The IIA's website has loads of useful and important resources for members and the institute is committed to improving services by putting digital at its heart. So what is available – and where can you find it?


Mapping the road to assurance

Assurance maps are a vital tool that guide internal audits and give audit committees peace of mind. Sandie Dawson, director at Dawson Corporate Advisory, offers insight into effective assurance mapping.

Practical approaches to auditing culture

Corporate culture is high on audit committees' agendas, but few understand what to look for and how to measure something as nebulous and intangible as culture. Alexander Glebovskiy, internal auditor at an FCA-regulated firm, shares his advice.

Need for speed: risk velocity in control design

The importance of velocity as a risk assessment factor has been widely acknowledged by the risk management community in recent years. But so far the profession has largely failed to agree on a meaningful concept for measuring and weighting velocity as a risk factor. Maybe a simplistic approach can help, write Matt Rigby and Christian Thurow.